(08-20-2015, 08:36 PM)marya Wrote: [ -> ] (08-20-2015, 07:44 PM)mickmackusa Wrote: [ -> ]It is now my opinion that, for players who want to analyze/develop their skills, WoCG is best site for pinochle.
Thank you, I am very happy to hear that! I try to do what I can to make the site useful to card players with all experience levels.
FWIW: I would love to make something like the hand animator available to players of other games. I'm sure your time is limited, and I know this board is all about the Pinochle... but if you ever find yourself twiddling your thumbs, I would love to see a hand animator for games like Euchre, Hearts, or Spades. I suspect you'd get players from other games at WoCG making use of it here.
That's a nice compliment. I am glad you like it. I wouldn't like to replicate it until it has grown at least a few versions. The status of the program is truly "in development" as it is not cross-browser compatible, I want to add features, and there are quite possibly things to remove/replace visually.
Regarding thumb-twiddling time, HA, I wonder if such time has the potential to arrive before I am in retirement. It seems every year I age, that I have more things to do and less time to do them! In a fantasy world where "free time" exists, I would be happy to accommodate other games. Have you checked that there aren't any similar applications already in the wild? The PP Hand Animator was inspired by online Texas Hold'em re-players.
Now that I think about it, my boy just chose his elective courses for high school next year. One of which is IT-based. Maybe he and I can do a father-son project. Hmm.
(08-20-2015, 08:36 PM)marya Wrote: [ -> ] (08-20-2015, 07:44 PM)mickmackusa Wrote: [ -> ]Having the histories emailed to the players is a clever feature as well!
Previous discussions have weighed the benefit of public record access versus the privacy concerns of players who don't want to be analyzed.
By emailing only the involved players (who requested the history), the game will only be directly distributed to a maximum of 4 people. (greater privacy via exclusivity)
I had read in one of the forum threads that a player was upset at the idea of having their hand history exposed publicly. I can't say I understand it, but I do make an effort to accommodate people, and I realized that if one person felt that way, there would be others. I don't want people to be afraid to use this feature. Currently, people can do what they want with their hand histories, and not worry about other people seeing it.
Rest assured, you are not the only person that doesn't understand this extreme fear of judgment. Regardless, I share the same feeling with you that if one person is saying it, then several others may be thinking it.
(08-20-2015, 08:36 PM)marya Wrote: [ -> ] (08-20-2015, 07:44 PM)mickmackusa Wrote: [ -> ]Thank you for not including the usernames in your hand history notation. Keeping players anonymous will ensure analyses are unbiased and non-hurtful.
I am curious... In the email to the user, do you tell them which compass-direction they were seated in? If they play multiple games before reviewing, they will surely forget their seat.
Currently, no extra information is sent in the email. I can certainly add this info if people want it (in fact the seats at the table are not distinguished by NSEW so you would need to remember what cards you were dealt to remember your position). I don't know the easiest way to deal with this. Initially I was going to include the first few letters of the player's name, along with the postiion (e.g. "marya" in the south seat would show up as "S-ma"). What do people think of that, is it showing too much? I could include the names of all the players in the email, together with seat positions, maybe at the top of the file, outside of the formatted hand history. Do you think this would cause problems? Once names are included in the file, you do increase the risk of player "humiliation."
I would deliver hand histories with the notation being the only content in the body, and the email title would be like "WoCG: Hand History (North = Marya)" or something. All other identifying data is currently held within your notation headings (Site, ID, tableid). I would like to discourage you from including screennames in the notation.
(08-20-2015, 08:36 PM)marya Wrote: [ -> ] (08-20-2015, 07:44 PM)mickmackusa Wrote: [ -> ]PlayOK offers hand histories as soon as the previous hand was completed.
Maybe it was not clear, but this is the same way that it works at WoCG. For obvious reasons, hand histories are not available during the play of a hand. You may send them to yourself when the hand scores are shown. Once you receive them, you can check them at Power Pinochle's hand animator.
WoCG has a timeout for gameplay at public tables. If you decide to go check the hands during gameplay, you will get timed out, to your own detriment. In contrast, at private tables, you may pause a game. The assumption is that people who know each other reasonably well are playing at private tables, and they will not abuse the pause feature (it also requires a majority vote). In this case, all players may want to agree to pause the game and check out the hand histories in order to discuss what happened. That's all for the good IMHO.
Oh ok, I misunderstood. Right, the timers (if applied) would keep the game rolling; this concern is dealt with. Great, if players want to stop the game after each hand and have a powwow, the data is available.
(08-20-2015, 08:36 PM)marya Wrote: [ -> ] (08-20-2015, 07:44 PM)mickmackusa Wrote: [ -> ]Hand History Authenticity:
Because players will be submitting the raw notation (as opposed to having it submitted to PP directly from the WoCG server) there is potential for modifying the notation. While I don't think this is a major concern, it should be mentioned that all submissions may be tampered with.
When developing the Hand Animator for PlayOK, I was working on a way to reference the game via a PlayOK url which held the notation in a .txt file. This removed the "middle man" and ensured authenticity. I didn't get around to completing that feature, but I do plan to one day.
TBH I don't see this as a concern. From my point of view, hand histories are there for instruction, not to prove your mad Pinochle skillz. If this becomes an issue, then I'm open to other solutions, possibly hosting hand history files at WoCG, or even sending them to Power Pinochle for storage (if you want to develop an API, I could call it to send this info so that the histories are stored at PP, with no risk of them being tampered with by a middleman). But then, this opens the can of worms about publicly identifiable user names... and whether to include them in hand histories.
Marya
I totally agree with you, it is not a present day concern. If one day it becomes one, an API is the solution. We'll cross that bridge if we ever come to it.
p.s. I forgot to mention that hand history posts, in addition to analysis regarding Offense/Defense/Bidding, can also be used for Venting with 100% accuracy. In the past, I've heard venting/glory stories but because of the emotions involved, I have been skeptical of accuracy. "We were down like 350 points... my partner was set every time he bid... they were one hand from going out... they got cocky and bid like 200 with double aces and triple pinochle... but ran into my 15-ish card marriage-less trump... we set them, and we went on to win the game... then I went fishing and caught a fish thiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiis big!
I suppose hand histories could also be used to investigate cases of suspected cheating.
Pure luck can sometimes be confused with cheating, so you can never have 100% certainty, but after collecting several suspicious occurrences where luck is highly improbable you can feel pretty certain.
If something looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and works for Aflac, you may as well consider it a duck.
With such a conclusion, you can simply "dislike" the stupid ducks and refuse to play with them; problem solved!
As a knock-on effect, because cheating players can be peer reviewed, perhaps this fact will act as a preventative measure.
I like it!
Again, remember PP is not a shaming site; not even for players 99.99%
proven to be cheaters. Of course, you may keep your own list, or even share your list with other
outside of PP.